Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Frye

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1957No. Civ. 8910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNE, J. pro tem. *

This is an action by respondent Harrison against appellants for an injunction to prevent the erection of residences and requiring the removal of such buildings partially erected which allegedly violate a recorded “Declarations of Restrictions” imposed upon the lots herein involved by the original grantor who is the respondent. The restrictions call for the erection of first class buildings only.

On January 30, 1938, respondent and his wife executed the restrictions on a parcel of property described as the Harrison Subdivision, and it was admitted by appellants that these…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. McCarthy v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Cleveland v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Pacific Feed Co. v. KennelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Threedy v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Riley v. StovesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  2. King v. KuglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Atkins v. FineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. College Book Centers, Inc. v. Carefree Foothills Homeowners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. Hiner v. HoffmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API