Legal Opinion

Gest v. Oregon AFL-CIO

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 4, 2012No. 090303274; A145876Published

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.

In this action for intentional interference with economic relations, plaintiff alleged that defendant Oregon AFL-CIO (her former employer) and defendant Thomas Chamberlain (president of the Oregon AFL-CIO) “intentionally and maliciously” sought to prevent her from gaining employment with the Oregon School Employees Association (OSEA). The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and plaintiff now appeals. Because we agree with the trial court that plaintiffs claim is preempted by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 USC §§ 151-169, we affirm.

Summary judgment is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Wisconsin Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations v. Gould Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Wallulis v. DymowskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API