Legal Opinion
Matter of Hirschfeld
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1998No. SB-97-0003-D; Disc. Comm. 89-0868, 90-1307, 91-1015, 93-0378, 93-0712, 93-1403, 93-1609, 93-1787, 93-1806, 93-1831, 94-0392, 94-0853, 94-0859, 94-0863, 94-0864, 94-0959, 94- 0973, 94-0977, 94-1065, 94-1215, 94-1227, 94-1708, 94-1755 and 95-0305PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZLAKET, Chief Justice.
¶ 1 This matter comes to the court on the unanimous recommendation of a State Bar hearing committee and our own Disciplinary Commission that respondent Robert A. Hirschfeld be disbarred. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. R.S.Ct. 53(e). 1
¶2 The State Bar charged respondent with twenty-four counts of unethical conduct involving twenty-two different clients. Although he was given notice and an opportunity to be heard, respondent did not participate in the presentation of evidence to the hearing committee, nor did he appear before the Disciplinary Commission. He…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Taliaferro v. TaliaferroArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re a Member of State Bar of Arizona RileyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Little v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
3Cited by7 opinions
- McQueen, Rains & Tresch, LLP v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- In the Matter of Rachel R. AlexanderArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- STATE EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DIS. OF NEB. SUPREME COURT v. WintroubNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re ConnellyArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re GlimcherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.