Legal Opinion

In Re Connelly

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2002No. SB-02-0055-D. Disc. Comm. No. 99-2417PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 This matter arose after Respondent Connelly’s client filed a complaint with the State Bar, alleging that Respondent charged an unreasonably high fee. We granted review to determine whether, when a client who has contractually agreed to submit fee disputes to binding arbitration files a complaint alleging his lawyer charged an unreasonable fee, disciplinary proceedings should begin before fee arbitration proceedings conclude. We hold that when a lawyer and client have agreed to binding fee arbitration and the disciplinary complaint involves no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Matter of HirschfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nixon v. BassSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. IN RE: DISCIPLINE OF HARDEEP SULLNevada Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Paul J. HarrisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API