In Re Connelly
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 This matter arose after Respondent Connelly’s client filed a complaint with the State Bar, alleging that Respondent charged an unreasonably high fee. We granted review to determine whether, when a client who has contractually agreed to submit fee disputes to binding arbitration files a complaint alleging his lawyer charged an unreasonable fee, disciplinary proceedings should begin before fee arbitration proceedings conclude. We hold that when a lawyer and client have agreed to binding fee arbitration and the disciplinary complaint involves no…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Matter of HirschfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. BassSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- IN RE: DISCIPLINE OF HARDEEP SULLNevada Supreme Court · 2025
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Paul J. HarrisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2025