Legal Opinion
Bridges v. Mt. San Jacinto Cmty. Coll. Dist.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided August 8, 2017No. E065213PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSlough, J.
*110This California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)1 case arises from a community college's decision to buy a plot of vacant land from *111a regional park district for potential future use as the site of a new campus. Plaintiffs and appellants Martha Bridges and John Burkett (appellants) are residents of Wildomar, the city where the land is located. They sued respondent Mt. San Jacinto Community College District (the community college, or the college) alleging it violated CEQA by failing to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) before executing a purchase agreement for the property.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Sierra Club v. City of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Save Tara v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- California Native Plant Society v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Voices of the Wetlands v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jenkins v. Brandt-HawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Save the Agoura Cornell Knoll v. City of Agoura HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Stein v. Alameda County Waste etc. CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2020