Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Campbell

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 23, 2016No. B263353APublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYegan, J.

Sitting as trier of fact, a trial court may draw its own inferences and conclusions from the evidence when hearing a matter brought pursuant to the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (DVPA). (Fam. Code, § 6200 et seq. ) 1 This includes the power to factually find a "dating relationship" within the meaning of the DVPA even though the parties characterize their relationship as a friendship that does not involve "dating" as that term is commonly understood. (See e.g., Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of Machinists (1964) 227 Cal.App.2d 675 , 696-697, 39 Cal.Rptr. 64 ( Fibreboard…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Kuhn v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rybolt v. Riley, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. People v. B.M. (In Re B.M.)California Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Gary M. v. Crystal S. CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Gruber v. Yelp Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Marriage of Tei CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API