Legal Opinion
Doe v. McMillan
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 29, 1977No. 75-2016PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
Appellants filed suit against various Members of Congress, their staffs and consultants, District of Columbia school officials, and the Public Printer and Superintendent of Public Documents, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and damages based on the publication of a congressional report containing material claimed to invade their privacy. The district court dismissed their suit, and this court affirmed. The Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal as to the congressional and District of Columbia defendants, but remanded for further proceedings as to the…
3Cases cited23 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by67 opinions
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Richard Atchinson v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Williamsburg Wax Museum, Inc. v. Historic Figures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Te-Moak Bands of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Wiggins v. District Cablevision, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.