Legal Opinion
DeVito v. Hempstead China Shop, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 13, 1993No. CV 91-5077 (ADS)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The plaintiffs brought this action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132 and 1145 (“ERISA”) to collect delinquent contributions to the plaintiff Funds under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement with the defendant. The plaintiffs previously moved for summary judgment, seeking an order granting them mandatory relief under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2). The defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and for leave to file a counterclaim.
This Court issued a Memorandum Decision and Order on October 22, 1992, granting summary…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- F.H. Krear & Co. v. Nineteen Named TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Luciano v. Olsten Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union—New York Employees Pension Fund v. D & A Bus Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Hyeon Soon Cho v. Koam Medical Services P.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Finkel v. Universal Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Perdue v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.