Legal Opinion

State v. Spanyard

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 20, 1984No. C3-84-910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Mary Lou Spanyard contends the trial court abused its discretion by finding she had violated a probation condition and by imposing sentence on a conviction that had previously been stayed. We affirm.

FACTS

On September 12, 1983, Spanyard pleaded guilty to receiving stolen property in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.53, subd. 1(1) (1982), after police seized numerous items at Spanyard’s home that had been stolen in a series of burglaries in St. Cloud, Minnesota. Spanyard testified that a friend had brought the property into her house, she knew it was stolen, and she took no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Pearson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HemmingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. LoshCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. MartiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. MootCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State of Minnesota v. Thomas Alan BoosCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API