State v. Spanyard
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Mary Lou Spanyard contends the trial court abused its discretion by finding she had violated a probation condition and by imposing sentence on a conviction that had previously been stayed. We affirm.
FACTS
On September 12, 1983, Spanyard pleaded guilty to receiving stolen property in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.53, subd. 1(1) (1982), after police seized numerous items at Spanyard’s home that had been stolen in a series of burglaries in St. Cloud, Minnesota. Spanyard testified that a friend had brought the property into her house, she knew it was stolen, and she took no…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Pearson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HemmingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. LoshCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. MartiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. MootCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State of Minnesota v. Thomas Alan BoosCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.