State v. Marti
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal by a criminal defendant who claims that in 1982 a probation hearing was held untimely and that even though probation was continued, a subsequent revocation of probation in 1984 was void as in violation of his due process rights. He also claims the trial court abused its discretion in revoking probation. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1976 appellant Richard Marti entered an apartment and forced acts of sexual conduct upon two women. He pleaded guilty to criminal sexual conduct in the first degree in Hennepin County District Court and was sentenced in January 1977 to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. DulskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ReyesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- State v. BonafideCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Heffernan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MootCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986