State v. Moot
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
James Moot appeals from an order vacating a stay of execution of his 38-month sentence for burglary. He contends the trial court abused its discretion by revoking his probation. We affirm.
FACTS
On January 11, 1985, appellant was charged with second degree burglary for breaking into a Minnetonka residence and taking several items. He pleaded guilty to that charge and the trial court stayed execution of the presumptive 38 month prison sentence, placed appellant on probation for five years, and ordered him to serve one year in the county jail. The trial court recited the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. HemmingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. SpanyardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. MartiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LoshCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re the Welfare of D.T.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re the Welfare of D.T.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- State of Minnesota v. Lenny Clyde WhiteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017