State v. Losh
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
Appellant challenges (1) the validity of the upward durational departure of her sentence under Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004) and (2) the revocation of her probation and execution of her sentence. Because we hold that Blakely does not apply retroactively to a pending probation-revocation appeal after the time to file a direct appeal from the final judgment has expired, we affirm appellant’s sentence. And because the district court did not abuse its discretion by revoking appellant’s probation, we affirm the execution of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LoshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- State of Minnesota v. Kamal Elyas MaqadinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. LoshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006