Legal Opinion

State v. Brydon

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1992No. 18861PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUBSTITUTE OPINION

The Court’s prior opinion dated September 8, 1991, is hereby withdrawn.

SILAK, Judge.

William Brydon pled guilty to one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. I.C. § 37-2732(a)(1)(A). He appeals from the judgment of the district court imposing a unified sentence of nine years in the custody of the Board of Correction with a minimum period of confinement of two years. He argues that his sentence is unreasonable and that the district court erred by denying his motion under I.C.R. 35 for reduction of his sentence. We affirm.

The facts of this case…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. FordeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. Ersel StollingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. State v. TorresIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. ChapmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BookIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. IzaguirreIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. OliveraIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. DayIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. TranmerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API