Legal Opinion

MMM Holdings, Inc. v. Reich

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided March 12, 2018No. G053739PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIkola, J.

*172Plaintiffs, MMM Holdings, Inc. (MMM), and MSO of Puerto Rico, Inc. (MSO), sued defendant Marc Reich, the attorney who represented their adversary in a whistleblower qui tam action filed against plaintiffs in the United States District Court.1 Alleging causes of action for claim and delivery, conversion, civil theft, unjust enrichment, and unfair competition, plaintiffs contend Reich received, wrongfully possessed, and refused to turn over, some 26,000 electronically stored documents his client, Jose "Josh" Valdez, took with him in 2010 when he was terminated by MSO for his allegedly "vocal…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Baral v. SchnittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zhang v. Jenevein, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Ojjeh v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. Onetaste Incorporated v. Netflix, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. Robert Gruendel v. Figure AI, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  5. Supershuttle Internat., Inc v. Lab. & Workforce Development AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API