Legal Opinion

State v. Barrett

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 16, 1989No. 23089PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

Appellant Richard Barrett (Barrett) was convicted of criminal sexual conduct upon his eleven-year-old stepdaughter (Victim). We reverse and remand.

Prior to Victim’s testifying at trial, the State presented Blanche Thomas, a DSS social worker, as a witness. Over Barrett’s objection, Thomas was allowed to testify to the details of what Victim had told her concerning the incident. Barrett contends this constituted impermissible “bolstering” of Victim’s testimony. We agree.

Ordinarily, when a witness has not been impeached, evidence of prior consistent statements is inadmissible.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. MunnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. GilliamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  3. People v. SandersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SchumpertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Taylor v. MedenicaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Jolly v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Dawkins v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Simpkins v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API