Legal Opinion

Jolly v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 9, 1994No. 24066PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bristow, Acting Associate Justice:

We granted certiorari to review the dismissal of Lester Jolly’s (Jolly) application for postconviction relief (PCR). Jolly contends that the PCR judge erred in finding that he received effective assistance of counsel. We agree and reverse.

I. Facts

Jolly was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct for having intercourse with his step-granddaughter who was less than eleven years old at the time. At trial, the victim testified that she lived with her grandmother, step-grandfather, and two uncles from the third to the fifth grade and that dur*19ing this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. SchumpertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Burns v. ClaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. Gallman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Simpkins v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. SaltzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Dawkins v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. ArdSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API