Legal Opinion

Dawkins v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 13, 2001No. 25340PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

We granted this petition for a writ of certiorari to determine if the post-conviction relief (PCR) court erred by not finding petitioner’s counsel had rendered ineffective assistance. We reverse.

FACTS

Petitioner was indicted for four counts of first degree criminal sexual conduct. He was acquitted of two counts and convicted of two counts. He was sentenced to thirty years in prison on each count, to be served consecutively. His convictions and sentences were affirmed. State v. Dawkins, 297 S.C. 386, 377 S.E.2d 298 (1989).

Petitioner was accused by Pamela Chambless of having sex…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Caprood v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Watson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Ingle v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. STALK v. RiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API