Legal Opinion
Rollerblade, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 24, 1997No. 96-1397PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals from the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade holding that the Customs Service (Customs) incorrectly classified the imported items at issue and ordering Customs to refund excess duties with interest to the importer, Rollerblade, Inc. (Rollerblade). We reverse because the items are properly classified as footwear and are not classifiable as parts of roller skates as the Court of International Trade held.
I
Rollerblade filed this lawsuit challenging Customs’ classification of certain merchandise imported from August 3, 1988…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Goodman Manufacturing, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Simod America Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Haggar Apparel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Midwest of Cannon Falls, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- The Mead Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.