Legal Opinion

Sambor v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1928No. 4175PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The conclusions reached are that the motions for a. restraining order and for a preliminary injunction should be denied, and the motion to dismiss the bill be granted. Although there are thus in form three motions before us, they all merge in the question of whether the order of the Pennsylvania Pub-' lie Service Commission, approving an 8-cent tariff schedule rate of fare by the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company operating a street railway system in the city of Philadelphia, is valid, in the face of a contract be*407tween the company and the city of Philadelphia that no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tidal Oil Co. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. City of Scranton v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Allegheny v. Millville, Etna & Sharpsburg Street Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. City of Philadelphia v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. City of Philadelphia v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. (PC) Gibbs v. WebbDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  2. (PC) Harris v. PongyangDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. Encinas-Solano v. United States Border PatrolDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API