Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Public Service Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 29, 1924No. Appeal, No. 247PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

The city and the intervening appellants are in such close accord in gathering from the evidence á rate-base sufficient to sustain the challenged rates, that but little need be said in recording our unanimous conclusion that this appeal should be dismissed.

The city complained that a proposed rate-increase was unreasonable and asked the commission to prescribe what the company might charge. The commission ordered the company to put into effect for a trial-period of six months, “a seven cent cash fare and a six and one-quarter cent rate of fare where coupon tickets in blocks…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Leiper v. Baltimore & Philadelphia RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Citizens Passenger Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. City of Scranton v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. New Street Bridge Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. City of Philadelphia v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Sambor v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Harmony Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co. Rate Case, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API