Legal Opinion

(PC) Gibbs v. Webb

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 15, 2022No. 2:18-cv-02817Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBART A. GIBBS, No. 2:18-cv-2817 JAM DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 J. WEBB, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former prisoner, proceeds pro se with a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. On January 25, 2022, defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to 19 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion or filed a statement of 20 no opposition. 21 Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 22…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Sambor v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API