(PC) Gibbs v. Webb
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBART A. GIBBS, No. 2:18-cv-2817 JAM DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 J. WEBB, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former prisoner, proceeds pro se with a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. On January 25, 2022, defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to 19 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion or filed a statement of 20 no opposition. 21 Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 22…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Sambor v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1928