Legal Opinion

Clackamas County v. Gay

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 5, 1997No. 91-11-217; CA A92660PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*709LEESON, J.

Plaintiff Clackamas County (county) brought this action to enjoin defendants from operating an airport and conducting a commercial skydiving business in an area of the county zoned for exclusive farm use. Intervenors,1 who are neighboring landowners, joined in the county’s lawsuit. Defendants contended that their activities constituted a lawful nonconforming use. The trial court determined that defendants were correct only as to a narrow strip of land and entered a judgment enjoining defendants from operating their airport and conducting the skydiving business beyond the limited…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Johnson v. Star MacHinery CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Monaco v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Kirsch v. CurnuttOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Clackamas County v. GayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Recovery House VI v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Liles v. Damon Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Clackamas County v. GayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Clackamas County v. GayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Estate of Tressel v. TresselCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API