Simpson v. Cotton
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
Plaintiff contends on appeal that the trial court committed reversible error in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment because genuine issues as to material facts exist. A motion for summary judgment should be granted only when, taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Koontz v. City of Winston-Salem, 280 N.C. 513, 186 S.E.2d 897 (1972). A moving party may prevail by proving that the opposing party would be unable at trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Rappaport v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Kekelis v. Whitin MacHine WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Lane v. DorneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clouse v. GordonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Strickland v. Town of AberdeenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Cummings v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- Roskiewich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998