Legal Opinion

(PS) Adams v. Bonta

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 29, 2025No. 2:24-cv-03300Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDON G. ADAMS, Case No. 2:24-cv-3300-DAD-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ROB BONTA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint alleging claims against defendants 18 California Attorney General Rob Bonta, Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford, and Director of 19 the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Rohit Chopra. The allegations fail to state a claim. 20 Plaintiff may, if he chooses, to file an amended complaint that addresses the deficiencies noted 21 herein.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API