Ohio Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The O. B. A. and the O. M. A. both assail the orders of the commission on the basis that they fail to set out adequate findings of fact and the reasons prompting the decisions. The O. B. A. asserts six other propositions of law, touching upon two basic issues.
One such issue is that the authority of the commission under R. C. 4909.16, with regard to energy emergencies, was preempted by the legislative creation of the temporary Energy Emergency Commission (E. E. C.), which, under Am. Sub. H. B. 206, came into existence on July 22, 1974, and was repealed effective December 31, 1975. The E. E. C.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- General Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Ideal Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Motor Service Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- O'Neil v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by6 opinions
- Inland Steel Development Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Monarch Construction Co. v. Ohio School Facilities Commission, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2002
- Ranft v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Duff v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- General Motors Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.