Legal Opinion

Ranft v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1984No. 83-874PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDahling, J.

The appellant asserts in his first proposition of law that where performance, under a right-of-way agreement, which provides the owner of the fee a right to natural gas service, has been temporarily prohibited by an emergency Public Utilities Commission order, the agreement is still in force, though dormant, and such an emergency order constitutes a complete defense to an action arising out of the contract or for the rescission thereof. We find this proposition of law to be meritorious.

The record reflects that the appellee’s predecessors in title, granted and conveyed the right-of-way…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Inland Steel Development Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Ohio Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Estate of Zoltanski v. ZoltanskiOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API