Legal Opinion

Inland Steel Development Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1977No. 76-632PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

Inland assails the commission’s order on the. basis of lack of jurisdiction from two fronts:(1) No section of the Ohio Revised Code empowers the commission to adjudicate controversies involving contract and property rights; and(2) the commission is without jurisdiction to adjudicate the same subject matter presently before the Court of Common Pleas and must dismiss that part of the appli*287cation filed with it that, relates to the pending lawsuit.

R. C. 4909.16 reads, in pertinent part:

“When the Public Utilities Commission deems it necessary to prevent injury to * * * the public * * * in case of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Northern Ohio Telephone Co. v. WinterOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Ohio Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kazmaier Supermarket, Inc. v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. TheuringOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Montgomery County Board of Commissioners v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Higgins v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API