Inland Steel Development Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.
Inland assails the commission’s order on the. basis of lack of jurisdiction from two fronts:(1) No section of the Ohio Revised Code empowers the commission to adjudicate controversies involving contract and property rights; and(2) the commission is without jurisdiction to adjudicate the same subject matter presently before the Court of Common Pleas and must dismiss that part of the appli*287cation filed with it that, relates to the pending lawsuit.
R. C. 4909.16 reads, in pertinent part:
“When the Public Utilities Commission deems it necessary to prevent injury to * * * the public * * * in case of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Northern Ohio Telephone Co. v. WinterOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Ohio Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kazmaier Supermarket, Inc. v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. TheuringOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- State ex rel. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Montgomery County Board of Commissioners v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Higgins v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.