Ideal Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
Appellant, Ideal, contends that (1) the findings of the Public Utilities Commission are not supported by the record; (2) the Public Utilities Commission’s order fails to state reasons supporting its conclusions; and (3) the order of the Public Utilities Commission is manifestly against the weight of the evidence.
The Public Utilities Commission has recorded 13 findings of fact in its opinion and order, dated June 26, 1974. Appellant, Ideal, argues in its briefs that only findings nine and ten have any bearing upon the denial of Ideal’s application, and that both of these findings of fact are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Motor Service Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Schwerman Trucking Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Michele Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by13 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Tongren v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Payphone Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Canton v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Werlin Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.