Smith v. York
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JANVIER, Judge.
Plaintiff alleges that as the result of having her hair treated in the establishment of defendant she received a burn on her head. She prays for judgment for $285 to compensate her for suffering, nervous shock, and the cost of medicines and professional attention by her doctor. Defendant denies that the -burn resulted from the treatment given in ¡her beauty shop and suggests that plaintiff did not suffer from a burn at all, but from an infection of her scalp.
Judgment below was rendered in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $110. Defendant has appealed and plaintiff has answered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sweeten v. FriedmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- Sebastian v. JennessLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Cassidy v. Beauty Studio, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- Morris v. MorrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Mixon v. BrechtelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Dove v. MessinaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Succession of VioscaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Perniciaro v. Travelers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.