Legal Opinion

Smith v. York

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1934No. 14605PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JANVIER, Judge.

Plaintiff alleges that as the result of having her hair treated in the establishment of defendant she received a burn on her head. She prays for judgment for $285 to compensate her for suffering, nervous shock, and the cost of medicines and professional attention by her doctor. Defendant denies that the -burn resulted from the treatment given in ¡her beauty shop and suggests that plaintiff did not suffer from a burn at all, but from an infection of her scalp.

Judgment below was rendered in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $110. Defendant has appealed and plaintiff has answered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sweeten v. FriedmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Sebastian v. JennessLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Cassidy v. Beauty Studio, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morris v. MorrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Mixon v. BrechtelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Dove v. MessinaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Succession of VioscaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Perniciaro v. Travelers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API