Legal Opinion
Sweeten v. Friedman
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided August 13, 1928No. 10,647PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.
The plaintiff claims $20,000 damages for physical injuries and for false arrest.
She alleged that she answered an advertisement published by the defendants in the Times-Picayune in the following words:
“Permanent wave, 6 months guarantee, this week $7.60”; that she entered defendant’s place of business conducted under the name of “Parisienne Hair Store” at No. Ill University Place, to obtain a permanent wave in accordance with the advertisement; that without any request. on her part she was first given a “shampoo” and afterwards the defendants’ employees proceeded to give her a permanent wave;…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crossett v. CampbellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Pearson v. Great Southern Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Wells v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- Marler v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- Rion v. ReevesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & FisheriesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Rawls v. Daughters Of Charity Of Saint Vincent De PaulCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Banks v. Food TownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Mixon v. BrechtelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Wilde v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarkets, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.