Legal Opinion
Mixon v. Brechtel
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 17, 1937No. 16468PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESTERFIELD, Judge.
A careful reconsideration has convinced us of the error of our former decree.
The defendant calls herself a “beautician.” She employs a number of other beauticians. She calls her establishment the “Silhouette Beauty Salon.” We have been unable to find the word “beautician” in any dictionary to which we have access, but we are, nevertheless, certain that it must signify a person skilled in the art or science of beauty culture — an expert. In this instance, defendant and her employees .have diplomas, though the school or college which bestowed that distinction upon them is not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barnett v. RobertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Sweeten v. FriedmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- Reed v. RosenthalOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Smith v. YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Sebastian v. JennessLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Calandro Development, Inc. v. RM Butler Contr., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Bush v. BookterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
- Am. Fid. Fire Ins. Co. v. Pavia-Byrne Engineering Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Horton v. Seligman and Latz, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Robert L. Waterbury v. Byron Jackson, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party v. William G. Blackwell, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.