Legal Opinion

Marshall v. O'Keefe

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 23, 1999No. AC 18044PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LANDAU, J.

The named plaintiff, Susan M. Marshall, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendants William J. O’Keefe and Jason J. O’Keefe.1 The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) failed to instruct the jury as to her requested Secondino2 charge3 and (2) excluded a prior inconsistent statement of Jason O’Keefe. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On August 1, 1992, the plaintiff attended a wedding reception at Walko’s Talk of the Town Restaurant *803in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  3. State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Opotzner v. BassConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Amsden v. FischerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. State v. SolekConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Ipacs v. CranfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Fenner v. Hartford Courant Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API