Legal Opinion
Draemel v. Rufenacht, Bromagen & Hertz, Inc.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 1986No. 85-289PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C. J.
D. Jeff Draemel appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of the appellees Rufenacht, Bromagen & Hertz, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as RB&H), and William M. Chapman, doing business as Chapman Commodities. Draemel commenced this action by filing a petition in the district court for Douglas County, Nebraska, seeking to recover damages against RB&H, Chapman, and Patrick Gottsch, Jr., for alleged acts of conversion committed by Gottsch while acting as agent for RB&H and Chapman. Specifically, Draemel alleged that Gottsch, while acting as agent for RB&H and Chapman, took moneys…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,437 Hetty Fey v. Walston & Co., Inc., and Robert A. SpiraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Hatrock v. Edward D. Jones & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Moore v. Puget Sound Plywood, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- Brown v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lustgraaf v. BehrensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Gibb v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Wachtel by and Through Wachtel v. BeerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Oddo v. Speedway Scaffold Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.