Bayne v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. Action by A. Y. Bayne and others, copartners as Bayne & Hewett, against the United States of America. There was a judgment granting insufficient relief, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
Bayne & Hewett brought suit against the United States to recover the sum of $4,432.88, which they claimed was a balance due them on a contract and supplemental contract entered into between them and the United States on December 21, 1907, for the construction of a bridge across the Mississippi river at Ft. Snelling, Minn. The action was brought under the provisions of Act March 3, 1887, c. 359, 24 Slat. 505 (U. S. Comp. St 1901, p. 752), and was tried to the court. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were made upon which judgment was rendered in favor of Bayne &…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Champlin v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
- Barnebey v. Barron G. Collier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- C. C. Mengel & Bro. Co. v. Handy Chocolate Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
- Burnett v. HopwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.