Legal Opinion

C. C. Mengel & Bro. Co. v. Handy Chocolate Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 26, 1926No. 1909PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

This is an action for breach of contract. The plaintiff was the seller and the defendant the buyer of 50 tons- of cocoa beans. The case was submitted to the District Court without a jury, and, without opinion or special findings of fact, that court entered judgment for the defendant.

The controlling facts are undisputed. The contract was in writing, as follows:

“Cocoa Contract to Arrive.
“New York, July 7, 1920.
“Sold for Account of C. C. Mengel é Bro. Co. to the W. H. Miner Chocolate Co.

Springfield, Mass.

“Quantity: Fifty (50) tons (5% more or less).
“Description: Usual…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Old Colony Trust Co. v. City of OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Friederichsen v. RenardSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Insurance Co. v. FolsomSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Deutschle v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  2. Poling v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1958
  3. Perini Corp. v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  4. Daniel Baker College v. AbneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  5. (HC) Anthony L. Zeigler v. FoxDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API