Burnett v. Hopwood
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff and defendant Hopwood became partners under an oral agreement in a stock and bond brokerage business in 1919. In 1922 defendant Davenport joined the firm, which continued under an oral agreement. On May 15, 1927, the three partners entered into a ivritten partnership contract.
When Davenport became a partner he paid $20,000, and Burnett and HopAvood, “having by mutual agreement of said [three] partners taken, each, the sum of $1,500 for their personal accounts, from the $20,000 then contributed and paid by said…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Clark v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Eastern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- The Ohio Crane Co. v. HicksOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Whitcomb v. ConverseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Love v. CouchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Orme v. Atlas Gas and Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. General Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Simeone v. First Bank National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Bass v. DaetwylerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Petersen v. PetersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.