Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Town of Sumner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1897No. 2445PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. John C. Stahlcup, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the ■superior court of Pierce county affirming a re-assessment upon abutting propdrty for street improvements in the town of Sumner.

T.ho town of Sumner in 1892 caused Main and Wood streets within its limits to be improved by grading and graveling at the expense of the lots and lands fronting thereon. The original assessment made for the payment of expense of improvement was declared void in the superior court.

The third finding of fact in the case at bar on the reassessment is as follows:

‘‘ That thereafter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frederick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Cline v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. East Hoquiam Co. v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Kuehl v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. City of Memphis v. HillTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Rackliffe-Gibson Construction Co. v. Zeilda Forsee Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. State ex rel. Hindley v. Superior Court for Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API