City of Memphis v. Hill
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Shelly County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Court — Hou. A. B. PittmaN, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bachmar
Mrs. Mary Martin Hill, the respondent herein, is the owner of six lots of land, aggregating some six hundred feet frontage, abutting on North and South, Third street, between Adams and Union avenues, in the city of Memphis. In August, 1912, by appropriate action of the city authorities, Third street between Adams and Union avenues was created an improvement district, and for the improvements then made the property, abutting thereon was assessed at the rate of $5.36 per front foot, Mrs. Hill paying as her proportionate share the sum of $3,255.44. North and South Third street extends…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rhodes v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1840
- City of Springfield v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Morewood AvenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Wilbur v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Bank v. MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Nashville v. Madison Park Land Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- West Tenneessee Flood Control & Soil Conservation Dist. v. WyattTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
- Southern Railway Co. v. City of ElizabethtonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
- City of South Fulton v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932