Legal Opinion

Rhinehart v. State

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 16, 2012No. 20100599-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

DAVIS, Judge:

T1 Tamra Rhinehart appeals from the summary dismissal of her Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Post-Conviction Relief (the Petition). Rhinehart argues that the trial court erred by converting the State's Motion to Dismiss the Petition into a motion for summary judgment and by then granting summary judgment in favor of the State. We affirm.

I. Conversion of a Motion To Dismiss to a Motion for Summary Judgment

12 Because Rhinehart did not preserve this issue for appeal, she seeks review under the plain error standard. See generalty State v. Holgate, 2000 UT…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ramirez-Gil v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  2. State v. Nunez-VazquezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  3. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  4. Billy Ray Lloyd, Jr. v. Ralph Terry, Acting WardenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Collazo-Collazo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API