Legal Opinion

Warne v. Warne

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2012No. 20100125PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION *

Justice PARRISH,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

{1 In 2003, Ira B. Warne (Ira) executed the Partial Revocation of and Amendment to the Ira B. Warne Family Protection Trust (Partial Revocation). The purpose of the Partial Revocation was to terminate the interest of one of Ira's sons, Thomas Warne (Tom), who had been designated as a benefi-clary in the original trust instrument. On summary judgment, the district court invalidated the Partial Revocation based on our holding in Banks v. Means, 2002 UT 65, 52 P.3d 1190. The district court also held that Tom was entitled to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Olsen v. Eagle Mountain CityUtah Supreme Court · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Winward v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Gressman v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  3. R.C.S. v. A.O.L.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Thayer v. Washington County School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. McLaughlin v. SchenkUtah Supreme Court · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API