Legal Opinion
W. E. Roche Fruit Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1943No. 29052PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
This matter comes before us on a bill of exceptions presenting but one question, which the appellant states as follows:
“Is it a substantial compliance with Section 96 of the Code in the selection of a jury list for the Judge to place on that list the names of women who had solicited jury service by signing a coupon published in the newspaper, addressed to the Clerk of the Court, or who had personally called at the Clerk’s office and asked to be placed on the jury list, practically all of the women on the panel composing 50% thereof being of that category?”
When the matter was called for trial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. StraubWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. BokienWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. KrugWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. LeroyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. TingdaleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. PayneWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Brady v. Fibreboard Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- State v. FinlaysonWashington Supreme Court · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.