Legal Opinion

State v. Bokien

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1896No. 1876PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.— Hon.Emmett N. Parker, Judge,

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

The information upon which the defendant and appellant, was tried and convicted charges that:

“The said Prank L. Bokien on or about the 31st *405day of December, 1894, at the County of Pierce and State of Washington, and within one year next prior to the filing of this information, did unlawfully, felo-niously, designedly and with intent to defraud one I. J. Sharick, that he, the said Frank L. Bokien, then had on deposit in the Pacific National Bank of the City of Tacoma, in the State of Washington, the sum of eleven dollars, which said sum of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Bessette v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  4. Keech v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1876
  5. State v. SorterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. Le PitreWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. Perez-CervantesWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API