Legal Opinion

Lichens Co. v. Standard Commercial Tobacco Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided December 21, 1944PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, Chancellor:

The complainant, a stockholder of the defendant, a solvent corporation, seeks to have a receiver appointed to wind up its affairs, alleging fraud and mismanagement by its officers and imminent danger of loss of property which might cause insolvency.

The demurrer raises two questions:(1) Does the Court of Chancery have the inherent power, upon the application of a minority stockholder, to wind up the affairs of a solvent corporation and to appoint a receiver for that purpose because of fraud and gross mismanagement by its officers?(2) If it has that power, are the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  2. Miner v. Belle Isle Ice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Maxwell v. Enterprise Wall Paper Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Fiscal Fund, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
  5. Mackenzie Oil Co. v. Omar Oil & Gas Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Production Resources Group, L.L.C. v. NCT Group, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
  2. Giuricich v. Emtrol Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Carlson v. HallinanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
  4. Daniel Cowin v. Charles S. BreslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API