Legal Opinion
Attocknie v. Udall
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 24, 1966No. Civ. No. 66-316PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMOEANDUM OPINION
EUBANKS, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a Comanche Indian who alleges himself to be an illegitimate son, was disinherited by the last will and testament of Albert Attocknie, deceased Comanche Indian Allottee No. 532, by the following testamentary provision: “I leave nothing to Willis Attocknie because he is not my son.” The Secretary of the Interior approved the will. Plaintiff brought this action for judicial re*878view under Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act1 seeking to have the decision of the Secretary set aside.
The averments of the complaint assign the customary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tooahnippah v. HickelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Atewooftakewa v. UdallDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1967
- Akers v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Couch v. UdallDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1967
- Eskra v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.