Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eskra v. Morton

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 29, 1975No. 74-1906Published

1DissentCummings, Circuit Judge

With all due respect for the view of my colleagues, I am impelled to dissent, largely for the reasons expressed by the district court in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Eskra v. Morton, 380 F.Supp. 205 (W.D.Wis.1974).

Plaintiff’s half-sisters, Faye Gable and llene Hollen, each received a Vsoth share of their great-aunt’s estate. At oral argument, plaintiff’s counsel stated that Constance Eskra’s share in the estate, if awarded, would be approximately $33. Plaintiff was barred from any share in the estate because of 25 U.S.C. §§ 348 and 464, which incorporate by reference…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Hanover National Bank v. MoysesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API