Legal Opinion

Feldman v. Kings Highway Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 1951PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Action to recover twice the sum of $2,000, which sum of money was paid by plaintiff to defendant, a bank, the claim of the plaintiff being that the payment constituted interest in excess of 6% per annum on an indebtedness owing by him to the defendant. Such action is authorized by subdivision 1 of section 108 of the Banking Law. The admitted pleadings are as follows: The indebtedness, originally in the principal amount of $15,000, was evidenced by a bond and secured by a mortgage, both executed on March 11, 1949. The terms, so far as repayment and payment of interest were concerned, were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. French v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. McCarty v. MellinkoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Hamilton v. Kentucky Title Savings Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Barringer v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1935

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Band Realty Co. v. North Brewster, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Arthur v. BurkichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Gulf Coast Investment Corporation v. PrichardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Berman v. SchwartzNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Hammelburger v. Foursome Inn Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API