Andrus v. Dyckman Hotel Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis. The case was tried before Charles L. Smith, J., who denied defendant’s motion to transfer the case to the district court because a .question of title was involved, and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. From the judgment entered pursuant to the verdict, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
This action was brought in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis under the unlawful detainer statute to recover possession of the Dyckman Hotel for nonpayment of rent. Judgment was rendered awarding possession to plaintiff and defendant appealed.
Defendant insists that the action involved the title to real estate and should have been certified to the district court for that reason. The parties were landlord and tenant. The evidence does not establish a controversy as to the title and the rule invoked does not apply. Radley v. O’Leary, 36 Minn. 173, 30 N. W. 457; 2 Dunnell,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thompson v. MyrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Petsch v. BiggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Kaufer v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Tilleny v. KnoblauchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Norton v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dahlberg v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Lilienthal v. TordoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Banner Grain Co. v. Burr Farmers Elevator & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Froelich v. LowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923