Petsch v. Biggs
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the municipal court of St. Paul, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
Action commenced before the municipal court of "St. Paul, under Gen. St. 1878, c. 84, § 11. The complaint alleges that on or about September 1, 1881, plaintiff, by verbal lease, rented the premises from month to month from that day to defendant, who on that day entered into possession pursuant to the terms of the lease; •that March 28, 1883, plaintiff notified defendant in writing to quit April 30, 1883, but that he still unlawfully retains possession. The •answer has a general denial, except as therein admitted or qualified, •and then alleges that in Augtist, 1881, the parties entered into a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ferguson v. KumlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Steele v. BondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
3Cited by15 opinions
- William Weisman Holding Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Dahlberg v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Hammond v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- William Weisman Realty Co. v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Steele v. BondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.