Legal Opinion
Lilienthal v. Tordoff
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 31, 1922No. 23,127PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On October 31, 1922, the following opinion was filed:
2Per curiam
An appeal from a judgment in an action of forcible entry and unlawful detainer in the municipal court of Minneapolis is pending here and appellant moves for an order remitting the cause to the court below for the purpose of moving for a new trial.
The practice in the municipal court of Minneapolis must conform to that prescribed for the courts of the justices of peace by the forcible entry and unlawful detainer act (c. 76, G. S. 1913), and not to that prescribed by the municipal court act in other cases, except as otherwise provided in the…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Lowry v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
- Bank of Willmar v. LawlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- International Realty & Securities Corp. v. VanderpoelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Nolan v. GreeleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Tilleny v. KnoblauchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Clark v. DyeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Dahlberg v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Central Union Trust Co. of N.Y. v. BlankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Craigmile v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Goldberg v. FieldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.