Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Friedland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 21, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant, a senior pension administrator for the employer, was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits based upon a determination by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. On appeal, claimant contends that this determination is not supported by substantial evidence. We…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of OrtasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Claim of Volpe v. SweeneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re the Claim of DeVitaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Claim of KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of FataAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. In re the Claim of FataAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. In re the Claim of RoedelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API